伟德国际1946手机版下载读书笔记:《金钱的魂魄》钱从哪儿来?要交何处去?

世界上几从来不不用钱的口,金钱如水流向四面八方,它的影响力没有国界。无论多少,它流经我们的时节,我们得把握接下去的流向。金钱的流得承接我们的容易和享受,也得以承接我们的怨恨与操纵得,这即是为什么钱是绝佳的自我实现工具。

同一句话概括:当我们感觉“足够了”,我们就是不再迷恋于短缺心态而盲目积累金钱物质,我们见面因此金钱表达好、实现人生最高可以,会开心满足,自然而然地起享受。

伟德国际1946手机版下载 1

Lynne Twist

作者:Lynne
Twist,一各项全球性的慈祥活动家,担任全球性NGO大型计划领导人近四十年,地球母亲联盟(The
Patchamama Alliance)合作创始人,个人网站Soul of Money
Institute。活动的重大对象是:终结世界饥荒;保护雨林;改善女性健康、经济及政治处境;增进对全人类意识的科学性了解。因为在环球筹款和进展项目,对金钱关系有了深刻的垂询。她行为援人们又清理和钱财的涉及,认清自己之心尖,重拾更正常、更轻松的生活。

版本:Publisher:W. W. Norton & Company; 1 edition (14 Mar. 2017)

A world where we live in the context and truth of sufficiency and
respect for enough, exactly enough for everyone everywhere; a world
that works for everyone
, with no one and nothing left out; a world
where solidarity replaces charity, and a world where the dream is a
dream not for some at the expense of others, but a dream for all; a
world where the intelligent and benevolent “force” of Nature is the
force that we respect and align with; a world where the love of
money is replaced by the use of money as an expression of love
.


博并非丰足

“诺贝尔经济学奖”今年老二糟颁给与心理学结合的行事经济专家。想到从前主流经济学假设“所有人且是追利益最大化”已经开始逐步动摇瓦解了。“最大化”难道不是殖民、掠夺、战争、疯狂购物、滥用的诱因吗?背后的逻辑就是是一旦不努力占有更多,自己不怕见面是得不至丰富资源的异常人。资源足够每个人分享,却休支持每个人滥用。如果大家还追求越多越好,那真会有人短资源,无法正常在。

以及那追求“最大化”,不如追求”刚好”,多余的故来享受。在与钱的关联及,看清这些钱文化的迷思,不再对金感到紧张。安全感并非来自拥有更多,而是在乎体会、感激我们真的的财富–我们的时间精力技能、我们的亲属、我们的知心朋友、我们的物料、我们的国有资源。当您发现自己其实具备这样多价值以及财富。当我们不再怕、自卑,这些能量都释放出来,流向实现理想,流向分享合作。享受不会见于您实在财富越来越少,反而会变本加厉富足感,让您的财富不鸣金收兵传递下去。

Everything ultimately was about caring for one another. Everything
ultimately was about collaborating, partnering, and ensuring that
everyone had a chance. In this connection and caring, these women not
only survived, but experienced their true wealth. 


起钱未自然有可观的金关系

笔者及先生属于富裕阶级。正缘来成百上千钱,在团结之社交圈里,必须不断晋升衣服、酒、车、房、艺术品、度假地点等全能够当当他人面前突显自己身份之东西,三单子女吗大半是由于保姆照顾,陷入追求更多的迷障。

用作一个大地筹款人,作者还不时和全球形形色色的来钱人打交道,意外发现,他们是不少关键:有人以为好是特权阶层,把好断开来,丧失了同丁连的过剩机遇;有人周围的同校都盖他起钱用远他;有人因钱纠纷导致本该密切的家庭涉及不跟;有人用钱数量定义自己,深深恐惧失去金钱,为了留金钱,即使剥削控制他人呢又所不惜;也有人以只要持续大量底金钱,不知道如何发生责任地用,怕人家用采取其,感到分外无力倒。

Where money defines life and character, the fear of losing it is often
profound. People behave defensively and even desperately to hold on to
the money, to get more and more of it, and use what they have as a
carrier for their own need to control others.The vicious circle of
money
—Money alone does not guarantee a fulfilling life, and
excessive amounts of money more often become an obstacle to it.


公益是同一互助

不怕强调尊重“受助人”,我们或许还是认为捐款就是是单方面地贡献爱心。其实不然,资助人及受助人是同台往共同之愿景努力的联手人-资助人提供好无法消耗的剩下物质与金钱资源,受助人提供创造力、技能、实际操作,二者同互助,双方的精神财富都赢得了晋升。

“If you are coming to help me, you are wasting your time,” an
indigenous saying goes, “but if you are coming because your liberation
is bound up with mine, then let us work together.”

开被推选了重重事例,尤其是笔者初期的同次等筹款经历。一个重型食品商家面世公关危机,想就此为”消除饥饿项目“资助挽回形象。作者到公司总裁的办公室,讲了15分钟项目情况,总裁完全无互动交流之欲望,不耐烦地听罢后,写了同布置大额支票给了作者。作者惴惴不安,但是要赶飞机去下一个筹款会,就收生离开了。下一个筹款会是当一个免富裕的社区,作者称得了晚,一个黑人大姐站起来,带头将团结叫旁人洗衣服赚的钱送为”消除饥饿项目“,自己则尚无过剩钱,但是认同项目的对象,愿意花钱在上头。在庙会众人的捐款,远远低于那张支票的数据,却由于真心认同,想如果介入实现消除饥饿的愿景。作者醍醐灌顶,虽然品类初期很需要捐助,还是将支票寄回,除了感谢总裁,还附言可以把这些钱为此当叫协调真正认同的地方。神奇的凡,过了几年即号总裁就退休了,他回过头来仔细询问了”消除饥饿项目“,发现自己真的十分认同,从自己之财产中捐了一大笔钱给这类别。是否接受捐助,取决于资助人是否真正肯定,而休有什么其他目的。

起塞内加尔漠到环球顶尖公司,作者从女视角关注世界之女。她为塞内加尔之女性赋权,让他俩会用自己之知让17独村带来难得的水资源。她为世界太有的片阴高管带来了反思的时,让有限独部落可以连续在同。高官们打破不断追晋升、工作的忧虑,停下来欣赏好之才干、自己之营业所、自己当干活与人家在中之美好得。之后的一样年里,她们有退休做任何从业;有的投入了公司的仁义基金会;有的还是了在本的生,但是状态是由焦虑与竞争及感激与满足。

恰巧以一心认同自己之做事,我们会尤其持久、坚韧不拔。就像笔者以遇见问题,觉得项目前景渺茫的下,没有退却而而是问了投机以下几独问题:

Who do I need to be to fulfill on the commitment I’ve made? 

What kind of human being do I need to forge myself into to make this
happen? 

What resources do I need to be willing to bring to bear in myself and
my colleagues and in my world?


够了,摆脱“不够心态”(Scarcity)

“不敷“心理:钱未足够多、时间未敷用、身材不足够美、衣服不足够穿、职位不敷高、影响力不足够充分。早上兴起,想在休息不够,晚上睡,想方今天致力开得不够。我们排新年计划、列行动清单、列人生目标很多,却格外少编写已来东西清单。其实身边的食指不少且好方便,”断舍离“、”极简生活“、”怦然心动的整理法“这类援咱对付多余的好方法才要我们受益良多。“You
or
I”的世界观让咱不自觉地接受了要生存就必得到更多,如果别人沾更多,我们虽会拿走重新不见,看到身边人的完结不免眼红。世界完全是得“you
and I”,身边人的成功表示ta可以大饱眼福更多了。

Let go of a lifetime of scarcity’s lessons and lies.Rather than
scarcity’s myths that tell us that the only way to perceive the world
is there’s not enough, more is better, and that’s just the way it
is
, the truth of sufficiency asserts that there is enough for
everyone
. Knowing that there is enough inspires sharing,
collaboration, and contribution
.

成人(Growth)并无是取得更多,而是加深与这总体人事物的连天,增强欣赏能力,开发敏锐的感官。我看罢《怦然心动的整理法》后,仔细抚平折叠一宗衣服,才察觉衣服剪裁的细节,衣服真实的造型,衣服原料的质感,一些用心的有点设计,让我越来越加珍惜这件装。大自然是我们最为好之师资。大自然里的资源是有限的,但也是够的,比如日光、比如和,不多不少,万物长到她应之旗帜,正是我们用的平衡。

找到一个若好感觉到方便的本状态,把心待在那里,用自己钱实现自身吧。

末尾,作者对我们日常生活的期许:

I challenge you to use your money, every dollar, every penny, every
purchase, every stock and every bond, to voice this transformation. I
challenge you to use the money that flows through your life—and it
does flow through all of our lives—to express the truth and context of
sufficiency. I challenge you to move the resources that flow through
your life toward your highest commitments and ideals, those things you
stand for. I challenge you to hold money as a common trust that we’re
all responsible for using in ways that nurture and empower us, and all
life, our planet, and all future generations. I challenge you to imbue
your money with soul—your soul—and let it stand for who you are.

伟德国际1946手机版下载 2

2017版封面


金句以及文化链接

“To be known for what you allocate, not what you accumulate.”

”Make a living, not a dying or killing”

“‘You and me ‘ world, not ‘you or me’ world“

“Now, I ain’t got no checkbook and I ain’t got no credit cards. To me,
money is a lot like water. For some folks it rushes through their life
like a raging river. Money comes through my life like a little
trickle. But I want to pass it on in a way that does the most good for
the most folks. I see that as my right and as my responsibility. It’s
also my joy. I have fifty dollars in my purse that I earned from doing
a white woman’s wash and I want to give it to you.”

The job of our time is to hospice the death of the old unsustainable
systems and structures and to midwife the birth of new sustainable
systems and new ways of being.



Bernard Lietaer, Of Human Wealth, says that greed and fear of
scarcity are programmed; they do not exist in nature, not even in
human nature. They are built into the money system in which we swim,
and we’ve been swimming in it so long that these shadows have become
almost completely transparent to us. We have learned to consider them
normal and legitimate behavior. 

He concludes that Adam Smith’s system of economics could more
accurately be described as the allocation of scarce resources through
the process of individual greed. The whole process of Smith’s “modern”
economics actually has its roots in primitive fears of scarcity,
greed, and the implementation tool—the process by which this became
real—was money.

Vicki Robin, in Your Money or Your Life, writes about people who,
instead of making a living at their work, more accurately “make a
dying,” or, in some cases, make a killing.

Buckminster
Fuller,
We
could move from a you-or-me world—a world where either you or I make
it, and where we need to compete and fight to see who wins—to a
you-and-me world, where all of us can make it.

“Remember, your children are your elders in universe time. They have
come into a more complete, more evolved universe than you or I can
know. We can only see that universe through their eyes.”

Riane
Eisler
The
Chalice and the Blade
: Our History, Our Future. She described what
she calls the dominator model of action in which men and traditional
masculine principles prevail, and the differences between that and
what she calls the partnership model characterized by more feminine
principles of collaboration and partnership.

Bill and Melinda Gates
Foundation

The great environmentalist Dana Meadows said that one of the most
fundamental laws of the earth is the law of enough.Everything born of
the earth grows to its appropriate size and then stops. The planet
does not get bigger, it gets better. Its creatures learn, mature,
diversify, evolve, create amazing beauty and novelty and complexity,
but live within absolute limits.”

Anne Morrow Lindbergh understood the exquisite distinction of
enough when she wrote, in her book Gift from the Sea: One cannot
collect all the beautiful shells on the beach. One can collect only a
few, and they are more beautiful if they are few.

Mother Teresa never kept any cash reserves. When I visited her at
her orphanage in India, I asked her if she had any advice about
fund-raising. She replied that her method of fund-raising was to pray,
and that God had always provided what she needed, never more, never
less.Most of us can’t imagine living in that way and I’m not even
suggesting it, but the knowledge that Mother Teresa operated a
successful multimillion-dollar operation just that way, makes you
think anew about money and flow.

Joan Holmes, president of The Hunger Project, challenged
contributors “to be known for what you allocate, not what you
accumulate.”

David L. Cooperrider, Diana Whitney, and their team of researchers
and consultants in the field of organizational theory and human
development introduced the concept of “appreciative inquiry” as a
formal model for change. In their book, Appreciative Inquiry:
Rethinking Human Organization Toward a Positive Theory of Change
,
they suggest we shift our frame of reference from one of “problem
solving” to one that seeks to identify the sources available in any
collection of people for inspiring, mobilizing, and sustaining
positive change
.

“Organizations, as centers of human relatedness, are ‘alive’ with
infinite constructive capacity”?Look for what’s working instead of
what’s not
, they say, and “instead of negation, criticism, and
spiraling diagnosis, there is discovery, dream, and design.”

To quote the visionary ontological thinker Werner Erhard,
“Transformation does not negate what has gone before; rather, it
fulfills it. Creating the context of a world that works for everyone
is not just another step forward in human history; it is the context
out of which our history will begin to make sense.”

Teilhard de Chardin: “We are not human beings having a spiritual
experience, but spiritual beings having a human experience.”

相关文章